Google Android Is Best Choice for Custom Apps

I’ve been writing a lot about the iPhone 4 recently, and if there’s one persistent theme to the comments I get, it’s that the iPhone fanatics believe that their primary competition is the Android platform, and that the iPhone is killing it. Unfortunately for them, they are at best delusional. At worst, they are making things up to make themselves feel better for dumping a ton of money on a smartphone that was flawed in its design, and has now begun to cost Apple millions of dollars to slap on a temporary fix.

The fact is, according to a number of sources, including Forbes and CNN, Android device sales have already passed sales of all iOS devices, combined. The Android platform, while everyone was focusing on the iPhone antenna issue, quietly passed the iPhone in activations. Author Seth Weintraub points out in his article that the Verizon Wireless Droid X and the Samsung Galaxy are each selling in excess of a million units in their first three weeks of sales. And of course, there are a large number of other Android devices that are also hot sellers, or would be if they weren’t already sold out, such as the Verizon Droid Incredible.

Some analysts point out that the high sales are due to the fact that Android devices typically cost less, thus inflating sales, but in reality that is the point. Apple has succeeded in selling an overpriced device to a group of true believers. Everyone else is buying something that is priced according to market forces. These hot sales have drawn the attention of developers, too, as Mike Vizard points out in this slideshow based on a survey of developers of applications for mobile devices.

While I wasn’t able to convince Verizon Wireless to tell me how many of its various Droid devices it’s sold, my back-of-the-envelope calculations tell me that Weintraub is probably right. The Droid X and the Droid Incredible are perpetually sold out. Sprint’s Evo is selling out. The Samsung Galaxy is still appearing in stores, but is selling well in all four of its incarnations.

And that’s the key to Android sales. Instead of restricting customers to one platform and one carrier, as Apple does in the U.S., the Android devices are available in countless versions from every carrier in the U.S., including AT&T, home of the iPhone.

Part of the reason is choice. People can choose their carrier, and their price point, and still have an Android phone. Part of the reason is also that Google doesn’t rule the Android environment with an iron hand as Apple does. You can, for example, build your own custom applications for your own company, and install them on your company’s devices without Google’s permission. With the iPhone, you have to convince Apple that you should be allowed to do this. Again, more choices.

So it should be no surprise that developer interest in the Android market is overtaking interest in the iPhone. As Vizard points out, developers like creating device apps without the carrier or the operating system maker looking over their shoulders. But more and more, they will also like the fact that the Android market is simply getting larger.

Comments

If you are going cite an article, you should read it carefully first. Heres the exact verbage from the link you included: That activation rate is already significantly higher than that of iPhone and nearing that of all of Apple's iOS devices combined. Apple (AAPL) just had yet another blow-out quarter, largely on the back of its iPad numbers, but their iPhone sales have been flat for the past three quarters. It is nearing all IOS, so what you say is a fact is, in fact, a false statement. I agree the Iphone has its flaws and so does the droid. Apple created this market and it is good for everyone in the end. Competition is good for business and consumers. I like the Droid but I bought an Iphone4 and I love it. Another question for the author "why is the bumper fix temporary?" It is not, the bumper completely solved the problem so I see it as a permanent fix. The way Apple handled is was shitty, I totally agree but why embellish the situation? Bottom line: We all over a choice. Hopefully other carriers will soon have the Iphone. I predict that it will be huge for Apple when it happens. For the many things Apple does wrong, they do a on right and every consumer of electronics benefits from their innovation, whether you choose to admit it or not.
If you are going cite an article, you should read it carefully first. Heres the exact verbage from the link you included: That activation rate is already significantly higher than that of iPhone and nearing that of all of Apple's iOS devices combined. Apple (AAPL) just had yet another blow-out quarter, largely on the back of its iPad numbers, but their iPhone sales have been flat for the past three quarters. It is nearing all IOS, so what you say is a fact is, in fact, a false statement. I agree the Iphone has its flaws and so does the droid. Apple created this market and it is good for everyone in the end. Competition is good for business and consumers. I like the Droid but I bought an Iphone4 and I love it. Another question for the author "why is the bumper fix temporary?" It is not, the bumper completely solved the problem so I see it as a permanent fix. The way Apple handled is was shitty, I totally agree but why embellish the situation? Bottom line: We all over a choice. Hopefully other carriers will soon have the Iphone. I predict that it will be huge for Apple when it happens. For the many things Apple does wrong, they do a on right and every consumer of electronics benefits from their innovation, whether you choose to admit it or not.
Your figure on Droid X sales is wrong. You misread Weintraub's article. The 1 million worldwide sales figure is only for the Samsung Galaxy S. The most optimistic figure for the Droid X from the analyst community is 300,000.
Gotta tell you, he's right about the iPhone. Apple has constantly made mistakes by strangling their products. That's why they only have 9% of the US computer markets. (2010 measurement). Now couple that with AT&T's monopoly cramping the data feeds? You've got a ton of trouble coming your way as this android market takes off and screams. the only thing they'll be left is the cult of "apple" and the fanboys who cling to the apples and mac machines like a religeon. I have a new Evo, wonderful phone. Smooth, clean, applications abound, fun to use. Got it after I dropped my Samsung Moment, and shattered it. I love the sprint navigation on the phone. You don't need to pay for a garman or a tomtom subscription for your car. Saved me more than a couple of times when I got lost. Guess I should just close with "yo! Fanboys out there. Don't be jealous. Just because your iphone screen is getting smaller, while the androids' screens are getting bigger, and faster. Pretty soon, you'll still be in an "exclusive" type of club. It just won't be because of the equipment." (grin)
Lov evo 4g
I agree with 'Anonymous (Exclusivity)' when it comes to '(junk apps, pesky UI overlays)'. Since Android is an open system, technical know how makes it possible for end user to circumvent this problem. It is not going to be easy though. I disagree with him/her when it comes to: 'unfortunately not everyone has $500+ for a nexus one'. I recently purchased TWO new Samsung Galaxy S "Vibrant" worth $1,000. T-Mobile sell these 2 phones for only $200. Regardless on how much one spends now, they will ended up paying more than the $1,000 after their contract expires in 2 years. That is the reason why carrier are subsidizing the phones. They get the money and they will locked you in. People might not have $500 but they WILL spend more than that eventually. It is only a matter when they spend it. I rather save my money and invest it and buy my car cash instead of making payment and ended up having the car costing me much more (in interest) when I pay it later. Google was trying to experiment with breaking that subsidy cycle by selling the Nexus One. I guess it did not worked out because U.S. consumer are not used to that and are willing to pay much more for their phone through expensive contract plan (subsidy). In other countries, one pays a lot for their Smartphones but saves quite a bit through service plan competition. In Belgium it is illegal for carrier to subsidize any phones and lock customers exclusively to just one company.
[Sorry this web site does not allow paragraphs. So everything is bunched up into one lump making this difficult to follow]. Interesting article. I personally think that people are more fixated with a well known brand. Thanks to Apple's investment in brilliant marketing campaign. It is unfortunate that Google is not doing the same thing for their 'Android' brand. This is true when it comes to both the media and the general public. The Media: In the last 3 months there were so many fantastic Android phones that were released to the market. Many surpassed the iPhone 4 specification and functionality. Despite all that, the media has been focused more on the iPhone 4 disproportionately. Apple's marketing is the key. I love their commercial on its dual video camera usage (video conferencing capability). Yet the HTC EVO 4G Android phone has this capability about a month before the iPhone 4. How does Sprint market that phone? They use things toppling on top of one another (Saturn V rocket for the Apollo moon landing toppling down). Yes, it shows the evolution of technology but it does not show what that HTC EVO can do or explain what 4G network means. The Public: I have traveled to a few countries around the world and tried to access the public interest on Smartphones in general. People are definitely more familiar with the iPhone's trade name. Just recently I met a person who wanted to change her phone plan from Blackberry to something else. She was considering the iPhone. After speaking with her and letting her know all the different options she could have, she finally remembered about the Android. Almost half a year ago, she did some research and was quite impressed with the Android. She wanted the Android to be her next phone. When the time comes for her to change, the first thing that came to her mind was the iPhone. She had completely forgotten about the Android. That is the power of brand recognition that Apple has to its advantage. What amazing about all this is, despite the power of Apple's brand recognition, Android is still making rapid progress mostly via the word of mouth. From one user to another. After a gentle reminder, the lady mentioned above decide to purchase an Android instead. Close to 10 new Android cellphones were introduced in just the last 2 months alone (June and July). This unfortunately did not make the news anywhere except on a few informational type web sites like this: http://androidcompare.com... Go figure.
It is not that the media didnt give the Android its fare spotlight, Apple markets their products. They advertise every where, they build up their releases, and everything they do is connected and by design. releasing 4 phones completely dilutes any marketing excitement you may have. And I cant imagine why the Droid is doing to well despite this when they have multiple carriers and Iphone has one. People seem to want to hate Apple for the success. It wasnt long ago that they were the serious underdog. Now thanks to world class marketing, they are at the top of the industry. It opens up doors for everyone else. Dont be a hater just because they succeeded!
Android is better because of its openness, but it is too bad that the carriers add some junk to the phones (junk apps, pesky UI overlays) and that there's no way to get rid of these things. Android would be even better without this nonsense; unfortunately not everyone has $500+ for a nexus one.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <b> <i>

More information about formatting options